Here’s a note sent to me by one of our readers.

What’s interesting is:

1) The note was transferred from First Financial Equities (Mario M Lndolfi) to Impac Funding Corp. (date unknown)

2) Then Impac Funding Corporation transfered/sold it to party unknown….blank endorsement.  If you look carefully, it looks like the party to whom it was assigned to was “whited out”.

So for Colleen, it is really cool she has this piece of evidence.

1) Now she can insist on the original because there seems to be tampering on the copy.

2) The copy was certified as of 2008.  She made her loan in 2006.  What happened to the note since 2008???

3) Her note is touched by MERS.  She lives in a judicial state.  MAN! I ENVY HER.  This is an easy win.

4) She can claim “pattern and practice as seen in exhibit X”.  ie. As we can see, these people have been selling and transferring ownerships of the note as a normal course of business.  Therefore, what’s to say IMPAC FUNDING is still the holder?  There is NO REASON at all for the judge to deny her motion to compel production of original documents.  If he denies the motion…then he is a corrupt judge. Period.

What are your thoughts?  Please share.  Let’s help Colleen.

Sincerely

George